May we count which pages you open and which steps you take, such as starting a report? We use PostHog, on servers in Frankfurt, with no cookies and no profile of you. Nothing is counted unless you allow it. You can change your choice any time under “Privacy settings” at the bottom of every page. Privacy policy

We count page views and steps only if you allow it: no cookies, and no profile of you. Privacy policy

This choice applies to fiveover.app in this browser.

Skip to content
fiveover

Fair wear and tear vs damage: what landlords can deduct

Fiveover editorial team 6 min read

Every deposit dispute in England comes down to one question: is this ordinary ageing, or did the tenant cause it? The schemes use a definition from case law, approved by the House of Lords in 1959: fair wear and tear is deterioration from the “reasonable use of the premises by the tenant and the ordinary operation of natural forces” (DPS). A landlord cannot deduct for that.

Damage, neglect and dirt are different, and a landlord can claim for them (TDS). But even a valid claim rarely means the full cost. The rest of this guide is about how the adjudicators get from the invoice to the award.

How the adjudicators decide

TDS, DPS and mydeposits set out in joint guidance how their adjudicators work: they decide on the evidence both sides send in, and never visit the property or meet the parties. They first ask whether the tenant is responsible at all, then whether the amount is reasonable (DPS). The landlord carries the burden of proof, because the deposit remains the tenant’s money until the landlord proves a claim.

The factors they weigh, according to DPS and mydeposits:

  • Length of tenancy. The longer the tenancy, the more wear is expected. DPS gives the example that an adjudicator is unlikely to award redecoration costs after a tenancy of five years or more, because the landlord would probably have needed to redecorate anyway.
  • Number and age of occupants. More bedrooms and more people mean more wear in the hallway, stairs, kitchen and bathroom. A family with small children is not a couple working from home.
  • Age, quality and condition at the start. A budget carpet that was already six years old at check-in cannot be charged as if it were new. It is not reasonable to fit low-cost items and then blame the tenant when they wear out through normal use.
  • Betterment. The deposit is not an insurance policy paying “new for old”. The landlord must not end up with a better property than at the start.

Apportionment in practice

When an item is damaged, the adjudicator works out what share of its remaining life the tenant took away. In one mydeposits case study on a damaged carpet, after allowing for two years of use the adjudicator awarded £195, 60% of the £325 replacement cost.

A simple way to build your own figure, which is how most reasonable claims look:

  1. Estimate a realistic lifespan for the item. For carpets and decoration in a rented property, mydeposits starts from five years.
  2. Note its age at check-in (1 year) and at check-out (3 years after a 2-year tenancy).
  3. Remaining life at check-out: 2 of 5 years, so 40% of value remains.
  4. Replacement costs £800, so the claim is 40% of £800 = £320.

The lifespan figure is your estimate, not a legal number, so write down why you chose it. An adjudicator will take a reasoned, modest figure more seriously than a full invoice.

22 examples: wear and tear or damage

No list is binding. Each case turns on the check-in record, the tenancy length and the evidence. This is how these items usually fall.

Item Usually fair wear and tear Usually damage or tenant’s cost
Carpet Flattened pile on walkways, slight fading, furniture dents Stains, iron or cigarette burns, rips, pet damage
Walls Light scuffs and rub marks, faded paint Large marks, holes from shelves, crayon, unapproved colours
Picture hooks A few small holes where hanging was allowed Many holes, heavy fixings, torn plaster
Door handles Loose handles, worn finish Handles snapped off, doors kicked or forced
Toilet seat Loose seat, worn hinges Cracked seat from misuse
Curtains and blinds Sun fading, frayed cords Torn fabric, missing blinds, burn marks
Wooden floors Light surface scratches, dulled finish Deep gouges, water damage from spills left
Kitchen worktop Worn surface, slight discolouration Burns from hot pans, knife cuts, chips
Oven and hob Faded markings, worn knobs Heavy burnt-on grease left at check-out (cleaning)
Bath and shower Dull enamel, ageing sealant Chips from dropped items, mould from never ventilating
Grouting Slight discolouration with age Black mould left unreported for months
Mattress Slight sagging after years of use Stains, tears, bed bugs
Sofa Worn cushions, light fading Rips, pet scratches, large stains
Windows Sticking frames, worn seals Broken glass from impact
Radiators Chipped paint on old units Broken valves forced by the tenant
Garden Lawn worn by normal use Overgrown, rubbish left, unapproved removal of plants
Lights Fittings faded or discoloured with age Blown bulbs not replaced, missing fittings or shades
Appliances Failure from age Broken shelves or door seals from misuse
Keys and fobs Worn keys Lost keys, fobs not returned, locks changed without consent
Smell Stale air after a normal tenancy Smoke or pet odour where the agreement forbade it
General cleaning Light dust from the move Dirt, grease, limescale well beyond the check-in standard
Decoration after 5+ years Needing a repaint Only specific damage beyond ageing

Dirt is not wear and tear. If the check-in says “professionally cleaned” and the flat comes back dirty, a reasonable cleaning cost is a fair claim. If the check-in says nothing about cleanliness, that claim gets hard.

How to evidence it

The adjudicator can only compare what you wrote at the start with what you wrote at the end. So:

  • Record age and quality at check-in. “Carpet fitted March 2024, mid-range wool mix” lets everyone apportion later. “Carpet: good” does not.
  • Photograph with a scale. A 3 cm scuff and a 30 cm scuff look alike in a wide shot.
  • Use the same words at check-out. If the check-in says “light scuff by door”, the check-out says “light scuff by door, unchanged” or “scuff now 20 cm, paint removed”.
  • Get both signatures. A report the tenant signed shows they saw it on the day.
  • Attach quotes or invoices. A claim without a cost basis is usually reduced.
  • Show your apportionment. Put the lifespan, age and percentage in the claim itself.

A check-in and check-out done on the same form, with photos and both signatures, makes most of this straightforward. With our check-in and check-out report you walk round the flat and talk while AI writes up each room with its photos. The other side can sign on your phone or later by email, and the PDF is sealed with a timestamp. For the deposit protection rules, deadlines and what happens when a tenant will not sign, see the guide to check-in inventory reports and deposit disputes.

If you cannot agree

If landlord and tenant cannot agree, either can raise a dispute with the scheme protecting the deposit. GOV.UK lists the three schemes, and once both sides agree an amount, the landlord must pay it within 10 days. A claim written with apportionment already applied is often the one the tenant accepts without a dispute, which is the cheapest outcome for everyone.

You talk. AI writes the report.

Check-in and check-out report: walk round and say what you see. AI writes each section and tells you what's missing before you finish. Then the PDF is sealed.

The other side can sign on your phone, on theirs from a QR code, or later by email. The PDF shows who signed.

Questions people ask

Can a landlord charge for repainting after a tenancy?
Only for damage beyond normal use, such as large marks, holes or unapproved colours, and only a share of the cost. Paint ages anyway. After a long tenancy, DPS says an award for redecoration is unlikely: at five years or more the landlord would probably have needed to redecorate regardless.
Is a worn carpet fair wear and tear?
Yes. Flattened pile along walkways, slight fading and furniture dents are normal use. Stains, burns and rips are damage. Even then the landlord gets a share of the replacement cost, reduced for the carpet’s age, not a new carpet.
What is betterment in a deposit dispute?
Betterment means the landlord ends up better off than at the start of the tenancy, for example a new sofa paid for by the deposit to replace a ten-year-old one. Adjudicators do not award betterment. They allow for depreciation and award a proportion.
Are small nail holes and Blu Tack marks damage?
It depends on the tenancy agreement and the extent. A few small holes from hanging pictures, where the agreement allowed it, are closer to normal use. Many holes, heavy fixings or torn plaster are damage. Check what the agreement says and what the check-in inventory recorded.

Sources

  1. What is fair wear and tear in a rental property? (TDS)
  2. Guide to deposits, disputes and damages: joint guidance of the three schemes (TDS, revised June 2017)
  3. In disputes, be fair (DPS)
  4. What makes a reasonable deposit claim? (DPS)
  5. If your landlord has made a claim (DPS)
  6. Wear and tear in renting: what it means and how it is applied (mydeposits)
  7. Deposit dispute case study: fair wear and tear and replacement of carpets (mydeposits)
  8. Tenancy deposit protection (GOV.UK)

General information, not legal advice. Laws change: check the linked sources for your case.